🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.